Home/ The Cases/ RSMI
B2B Lead Gen · Telephony Equipment · Meta Ads + Google Ads · 18 Months

1,982 leads. $12 average CPL. ~$400K in pipeline opportunity. A pipeline the business ran on, until acquisition.

RSMI sold professional telephony equipment to businesses. Sales were B2B, consultative, relationship-driven. There was no self-serve checkout. Every sale started with a conversation. Every conversation started with a qualified lead. The partnership ran until the company was sold.

All figures reported in USD. Original transactions in BRL converted at R$5 ≈ $1 USD. ROAS and conversion-rate figures are currency-neutral.

1,982
leads generated
$12.05
average CPL
> 60%
qualification rate, sales-validated
~$400K
pipeline opportunity
Stayed
until the company's sale

Section 1 · The Problem

RSMI sold professional telephony equipment to businesses: IP-PBX systems, hardphones, headsets, and the technical infrastructure that medium-sized companies need to run their internal and external communications. The buyer was an IT manager or business owner comparing specs, prices, and suppliers. The ticket sat around $200 USD per unit, with deals frequently bundling multiple units across a company.

When RSMI came to Loocro, paid traffic wasn't a growth experiment. It was the primary engine for new business. Without a consistent flow of qualified leads, the pipeline dried up and sales stalled within weeks. The sales team didn't have time to chase noise. They needed conversations with buyers who could actually purchase.

The challenge was twofold. Telephony equipment is a technical, high-consideration purchase. And the unit economics demanded a CPL that left margin for the sales team to operate. Getting in front of the right person at the right moment, at a cost that made the math work. That was the job.

Section 2 · The Diagnosis

Three observations shaped the strategy.

01Volume of leads wasn't the problem. Quality was the lever.

Generating leads on telephony equipment isn't hard if "lead" is defined loosely. Generating leads the sales team will actually call back is harder, and that's the metric that pays. Sales-validated qualification rate had to be the operating standard from week one. Industry benchmarks for B2B sit between 25% and 45%. We set 60% as the floor.

02Google and Meta needed to play different roles.

Google could capture active intent: IT managers and business owners searching for specific equipment models, comparing brands, evaluating suppliers. Meta could build reach among decision-makers who matched the buyer profile but hadn't started searching yet. Running them under the same logic, with the same creative and the same bid strategy, would have left signal on the table on both channels.

03The CPL ceiling was non-negotiable.

With a $200 average ticket and consultative sales-team time as the variable cost behind every closed deal, the CPL had to stay under a threshold that made the unit economics work. We set the budget allocation rules to cut any campaign that drifted above the ceiling for more than two weeks. Discipline above patience.

The diagnosis: build parallel engines for active intent and audience reach, hold qualification rate above 60% from the start, and treat CPL as a hard ceiling, not a target.

Section 3 · What Changed

We ran parallel campaigns on Meta Ads and Google Ads, segmented by product line and buyer intent.

Google captured active demand.

Search campaigns tied to specific equipment models, brand names, and technical specifications. IT managers and business owners actively comparing telephony solutions met RSMI at the moment of decision.

Meta built reach among the buyer profile.

Targeting decision-makers in industries that match RSMI's typical buyer (mid-market companies, services and operations leadership), who weren't searching yet but matched the profile of a future RSMI customer.

Every month, budget reallocated based on which channel and which campaign produced the most qualified leads at the lowest cost. The goal wasn't impressions or clicks. It was qualified conversations in the sales team's hands, week after week.

The qualification feedback loop ran weekly. The sales team reported back on lead quality, the campaigns adjusted, and the qualification rate held above 60% across all eighteen months we worked together.

Section 4 · The Metrics (10 documented months · July 2023 through April 2024)

MonthLeadsCPL (USD)
Jul/2023206$10.32
Aug/2023241$8.64
Sep/2023272$9.58
Oct/2023203$12.75
Nov/2023165$15.14
Dec/2023178$13.28
Jan/2024207$13.16
Feb/2024157$15.35
Mar/2024217$11.83
Apr/2024136$14.08
Total / avg1,982 leads$12.05 avg
Lifetime MetricValue
Total documented leads1,982
Sales-validated qualification rate> 60% throughout
Pipeline opportunity~$400K

Read the table this way: CPL bounced between $8 and $15 across ten months, averaging $12. That's the right band for telephony equipment B2B with a sustainable qualification rate. Anyone can buy cheap leads. The number that matters operationally is the qualification rate combined with the CPL ceiling. Both held for eighteen months.

They knew what they were doing. But more than that, they treated our business with care.

I trust Loocro because they deliver results with honesty and real commitment.

Sergio Dall Onder Sergio Dall Onder Founder @ RSMI
Questions B2B founders ask about this case

FAQ

Were all 1,982 leads generated for RSMI qualified?
No, and Loocro does not claim they were. Of the 1,982 leads generated across the 18 months, more than 60% passed the sales team's qualification check. The B2B benchmark for qualification rate sits between 25% and 45%, so 60%+ is above market. The number that matters operationally is the qualification rate combined with the CPL ceiling. Both held for eighteen months.
$12 average CPL for technical B2B equipment sounds low. What's the catch?
The CPL number is real for RSMI's specific category and buyer profile (telephony equipment for mid-market companies). It's not a universal benchmark. Categories with broader buyer profiles, sharper competition, or weaker keyword intent will produce higher CPLs even with the same operating discipline. What's replicable across categories is the framework: parallel channel structure, qualification rate as the operating standard, CPL as a hard ceiling.
Why is only 10 of the 18 months documented in detail?
The 10 documented months represent the period with complete reporting captured for the case file: July 2023 through April 2024. The partnership ran longer on both sides of that window. The 10-month detail is enough to show the stability of the system: leads per month, CPL behavior, qualification rate, and the consistency of the pipeline output.
The company was sold. Did the acquisition affect the partnership?
The partnership ran through the sale process and concluded as the new ownership restructured the operation. The growth engine had operated long enough and consistently enough that it was part of what the buyer was acquiring. That's the kind of result that justifies long-term paid media investment: it doesn't just produce monthly revenue, it produces strategic optionality.
How fast would a similar B2B lead-gen operation see results like this?
First qualified leads, weeks 2-4. Stable monthly volume at acceptable CPL, months 2-3. Qualification rate above the 60% benchmark, weeks 3-6 once the feedback loop with the sales team is wired. CPL stability over a year, conditional on the unit economics of the category. The framework moves faster than the absolute numbers stabilize.
Running B2B lead gen for a consultative, technical product?

Book a 30-minute diagnosis.

Thirty minutes. Bring whatever numbers you have. We'll look at your CPL, your qualification rate, your channel mix, and the gap between leads generated and pipeline accepted. You decide what to do with the information.